Brian C. Cannon

 

Silicon Valley Office
Tel: 650-801-5000
Fax: 650-801-5100
briancannon@quinnemanuel.com
Practice Areas
Intellectual Property Litigation

Education

 

Cornell Law School (J.D., magna cum laude, 1994)

Cornell Law Review

Editor

Order of the Coif

 

Cornell University (B.A., Biology, 1991)





Send to a friend

Biography

 

Brian Cannon's focus is intellectual property litigation, in particular patent infringement actions.  He has litigated and tried numerous patent and trade secret cases, involving medical devices, laser scanning microscopes and semiconductor processing techniques.  He was formerly a partner at Shearman & Sterling, and before that, Fish & Neave. 




Representative Clients

 

Becton Dickinson
Bio-Rad
Nellcor
Palm
Roche Molecular Systems
Samsung
Symyx




Notable Representations

 

Represented Palm Inc in defeating a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction filed against it for trademark infringement.  Represented Symyx in defeating temporary restraining order related to trade secrets.  Represented medical device company successfully asserting its immunoassay patent portfolio against competitors in United States District Courts and private arbitrations.  Currently representing Roche Molecular Systems in a patent case involving HIV diagnostic kits. 
 

Co-authored an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Time-Warner Inc., IAC/Interactive and Viacom Inc. in KSR International v. TeleFlex, No. 04 1350, decided April 30, 2007, concerning the standard for obviousness for patents.
 

Co-authored an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Affymetrix, Inc. and Professor John Barton in support of petitioner in Laboratory Corp. of America v. Metabolite Labs., No. 04-607, decided July 24, 2006, concerning the patentability of DNA gene patents.

 

Co-authored an amicus brief in the United States Supreme Court on behalf of Time-Warner Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Google Inc. and others in support of petitioner in eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, No. 05-130, decided May 15, 2006, concerning the Federal Circuit's automatic injunction rule in patent cases.