Scott B. Kidman

 

Los Angeles Office
Tel: 213-443-3000
Fax: 213-443-3100
scottkidman@quinnemanuel.com

Practice Areas
Intellectual Property Litigation
Entertainment and Media Litigation
Banking and Financial Institution Litigation

Education

 

Loyola Marymount University (J.D., magna cum laude, 1985)

Loyola International and Comparative Law Journal:

Editor, 1984-1985

Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review:

Staff member, 1983-1984

 

University of California, Los Angeles (B.A., cum laude, 1982)




Send to a friend

Biography

 

Scott Kidman is a partner in Quinn Emanuel's Los Angeles office.  Mr. Kidman's practice focuses on complex commercial litigation and intellectual property litigation including trademark, trade dress, patent, copyright, trade secret and false advertising disputes. 




Representative Clients

 

Mattel
eBay
Nike
K-Swiss
Airborne, Inc 
Archipelago, Inc.
FTD
Bad Boy Brands
Roommates.com




Notable Representations

 

Represented Mattel, Inc. in its highly-publicized copyright action against MGA Entertainment, manufacturer of "Bratz" dolls, and Carter Bryant, Bratz's creator.  After a three-month trial, won a unanimous jury verdict that Bryant had created the "Bratz" name and virtually all Bratz design drawings, prototypes and sculpts while he was a Mattel employee and therefore were Mattel's property.  Further won jury verdicts of copyright infringement, tortious interference with contract and other business torts in Mattel's favor and a damages award to Mattel in excess of $100 million.  Subsequently obtained an injunction prohibiting MGA's further manufacture and sale of Bratz dolls and requiring MGA to recall infringing products from retail shelves. 

 

Represented Nike when adidas prevailed on claims in Europe that Nike's use of two stripes on apparel infringed adidas's three-stripe trademark.  Filed the complaint on Nike's behalf in the District Court of Oregon seeking a declaration that Nike's use of two stripes and other decorative striping on apparel and footwear in the United States did not infringe or dilute adidas's three-stripe mark.  After positioning the case to put the scope of adidas's three-stripe mark at issue, adidas conceded the case and filed a broad covenant not to sue Nike in the United States over apparel and footwear products incorporating a wide variety of multi-stripe designs, including all Nike two-stripe products. 

 

Successfully defended Nike against a $40 million trade dress and patent infringement claims by a rival shoe company over Nike's Air Jordan XVII basketball shoe.

 

Obtained multi-million dollar verdict, injunction and award of attorneys' fees in a trade dress infringement action for Mattel.
 
Obtained seven figure settlement for plaintiff, a leading toy company, in misappropriation of trade secret action.


Obtained defense verdict in a three week jury trial in which plaintiff alleged that he was terminated and denied millions of dollars in commissions for refusing to engage in illegal activity.


Obtained defense verdict for a major aerospace company in a whistleblower lawsuit after a four week jury trial.
 
Obtained favorable settlements for Airborne, Inc. in a series of trade dress and trademark infringement actions involving competing private label products.
 
Obtained favorable settlement on behalf of FTD in false advertising lawsuit.
 
Obtained favorable settlement for individual plaintiffs in a misappropriation of likeness and false advertising case.