The SFO’s Corporate Co-operation Guidance: Clarifying the Burdens of Cooperation, but Keeping the Benefits Obscure

Last week the UK Serious Fraud Office (“SFO”) published its long-anticipated guidance on the steps companies should take when choosing to cooperate with the agency’s investigations. A mere five pages long, the SFO’s Corporate Co-operation Guidance (the “Guidance”) nevertheless provides welcome insight on what the SFO takes cooperation to mean, and what actions will be perceived as inconsistent with cooperation. The Guidance is focused on two areas: (1) preserving and providing material (e.g., electronic communications, financial records, etc.) to the SFO; and (2) providing the SFO with witness accounts (i.e., interview memoranda or notes) and navigating attendant privilege issues. The latter section of the Guidance is notably double-edged, offering clarity with a cost by imposing an additional burden when asserting claims of privilege over witness accounts. While a step in the direction of clarity, the Guidance leaves certain key questions unanswered and indicates potential points of tension with equivalent guidance provided by the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”).

Click here to continue reading. 

***

If you have any questions about the issues addressed in this memorandum, or if you would like a copy of any of the materials mentioned in it, please do not hesitate to reach out to: