Quinn Emanuel has one of the world’s elite investigations, government enforcement and white collar criminal defense practices. Over 50 partners in a dozen offices worldwide are experts in the field and our firm has repeatedly been recognized as being among the very best by numerous legal publications, including Chambers USA (2017), Chambers UK (2017), Law360 (2016), The American Lawyer (2017), The National Law Journal (2017), The International Who’s Who of Business Lawyers (Law Business Research Ltd., 2017, 2016), Legal 500 (2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011), and Best Lawyers (Woodward White, inc., 2016, 2015, 2013). Notably, our practice group was named “Transatlantic Investigations Team of the Year” by Legal Week and The American Lawyer at the 2017 Transatlantic Legal Awards, “Most Impressive Investigations Practice of the Year” by the Global Investigations Review in 2015, and “White Collar Practice Group of the Year” by Law360 for both 2015 and 2016.
Deep experience with government investigations. In government-facing matters, experience as a prosecutor is important. Over 25 of our partners have served as attorneys for the U.S. Department of Justice (the “DOJ”), United States Attorneys (for the chief prosecutor for the United States in each federal district), Assistant United States Attorneys, attorneys for the UK’s Serious Fraud Office (the “SFO”), or other high ranking government lawyers. Given this valuable experience, our partners understand the dynamics of a prosecutor’s charging decision. As a result, we have considerable expertise in designing and implementing strategies to avert criminal charges.
We focus on getting the best resolutions as quickly as possible. Of course, the best resolution of a criminal matter is achieved when no charges are ever brought, whether because a successful internal investigation provides the basis for a negotiated resolution or because presenting a vigorous defense early shows the government authority the downside to pursuing prosecution. We recognize that the mere filing of a criminal charge can ruin a client’s reputation and trigger catastrophic financial losses. While Quinn Emanuel has regularly represented clients in high profile matters covered on the front pages of The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, Financial Times and other publications, our best results have often been obtained quietly, outside the public glare, by persuading government lawyers to refrain from filing charges. To effectively conduct these negotiations, it is critical that the lawyer has earned the respect of the prosecutors, which requires mastery of the process. Our partners’ extensive experience with the government gives us that expertise.
Our experience in corporate investigations, government enforcement and white collar defense is wide-ranging and diverse. We have conducted sensitive internal investigations at the direction of corporate General Counsel, Audit Committees and Special Committees. We have successfully represented both corporations and individuals in congressional investigations, grand jury investigations, at trial and on appeal. We have conducted internal investigations regarding and defended clients against, allegations of health care, securities and government contract fraud, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) violations, Corruption, Money Laundering and Trade Sanctions, Economic Espionage and Trade Secrets Theft, Tax Evasion, Fraud, Asset Forfeiture, Employment and Immigration Issues, Environmental Violations, and violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute, the False Claims Act, and Criminal Antitrust statutes. We have litigated against virtually every U.S. enforcement agency including the DOJ, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the U.S. Department of the Treasury and its Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), as well as Attorneys General and District Attorneys in numerous states. Likewise, we frequently advise clients in connection with international extradition matters, and in proceedings before the International Criminal Police Organization (“INTERPOL”) and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (“ICHR”).
We have an international practice with partners located in 19 global offices, and have represented clients around the world, including in the United States, and throughout the world, including Latin America, Asia, Australia, Europe, the Middle East and Russia. Much of our work has been done on behalf of foreign companies and individuals whose activities have drawn the attention of U.S. regulators and prosecutors. Our global resources, coupled with our unique cross-border experience, allow us to effectively and efficiently navigate related criminal investigations in multiple jurisdictions.
OUR INTERNATIONAL PRESENCE
Our European practice has recently focused on representing (i) the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (“FIFA”) in connection with U.S. and Swiss criminal investigations into allegations of bribery and corruption in the international soccer world (the “FIFA Investigation”), including conducting an internal investigation on behalf of the organization; (ii) a Switzerland-based, international private bank, in connection with the global criminal investigations involving 1MDB, Malaysia’s sovereign wealth fund; (iii) several major European banks in connection with the “Panama Papers” investigation focused on whether accounts at the bank held under the names of companies created by the Panamanian law firm, Mossack Fonseca, were used to evade taxes, conduct business with sanctioned individuals or companies or otherwise engage in criminal activity; (iv) ENRC, a large mining conglomerate formerly listed on the London Stock Exchange, in a high-profile investigation by the UK SFO of alleged bribery in the company’s operations in Africa; (v) several European banks in connection with investigations involving Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (“Petrobras”), Brazil’s state-owned oil company, and Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. (“PdVSA”), Venezuela’s state-owned oil company, focused on whether accounts at the banks were used to pay bribes to Petrobras or PdVSA officials in return for contracts; (vi) a European bank in connection with a DOJ Antitrust Division investigation into market manipulation of precious metals prices; (vii) two major European banks, including by investigating whether the banks knew or should have known that accounts at the banks were used to pay bribes; and (viii) a multinational logistics and transportation company based in Switzerland in a DOJ investigation of alleged violations of the FCPA.
Our Latin American practice regularly represents clients in (i) criminal and regulatory matters involving Latin America, such as investigations, prosecutions and trials against U.S. enforcement agencies, including the DOJ, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the SEC and their European equivalents, and (ii) cross-border internal investigations involving U.S. and Latin American jurisdictions and laws.
One factor that distinguishes us from other law firms is that our Latin America practice includes partners, associates, paralegals and secretaries who are fluent in Spanish and Portuguese, most of whom are bi-cultural and many of whom are trained and licensed to practice law in Latin America, in addition to the United States. Having a team comprised of bi-lingual and bi-cultural professionals provides our clients a unique advantage where understanding subtle cultural differences and nuances is often critical. In recent years, we have been involved in many major criminal cases involving Latin America.
The practice’s recent representations include: (i) the Odebrecht Group (“Odebrecht”), the largest construction company in Brazil, in the largest-ever global bribery resolution with the United States, Brazil and Switzerland resolving allegations of corruption in a dozen countries related to the Brazilian bribery scandal (known as Operation Car Wash or Lava Jato), the largest corruption scandal in Latin American history; (ii) the South American soccer federation, the Confederación Sudamericana de Fútbol (“CONMEBOL”), in connection with U.S. criminal investigations and prosecutions into allegations of bribery and corruption in the international soccer world; (iii) the Special Committee of Banco BTG Pactual S.A. (“BTG Pactual”) in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its former CEO and other bank executives, in which we found no basis to support the allegations against the Bank and its employees; (iv) Jaime and Yani Rosenthal, who are members of one of the wealthiest and most prominent families in Central America, in the largest ever international criminal case involving Honduras in connection with DOJ money laundering investigations and related OFAC proceedings; (v) Erick Archila-Dehesa, a prominent Guatemalan businessman and former Minister of Mines and Energy of Guatemala, in connection with the Guatemalan government’s allegations that he committed money laundering during his tenure as Minister, in proceedings before INTERPOL and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (the “ICHR”); (vi) Ricardo Carrion, one of the most successful investment bankers in Peru, in the largest ever U.S. criminal and civil insider trading investigation involving Peru; (vii) the Government of Brazil in a corruption matter involving former senior government officials and multiple jurisdictions; (viii) the general manager of one of the largest energy companies in Central America in connection with allegations of bribery in Guatemala; (ix) a Mexican high-ranking executive for Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in connection with DOJ and SEC FCPA investigations against Wal-Mart; (x) a large Argentinean oil company and its owner, one of Argentina’s wealthiest individuals, in connection with high-profile DOJ and SEC investigations involving alleged FCPA violations to secure an extension of oil rights in an Argentinean oilfield; (xi) the United States’s largest chemical and industrial products company in an internal investigation of alleged corruption involving its Mexican subsidiary; (xii) a senior executive of one of Venezuela’s largest engineering companies in DOJ investigations into corruption and money laundering involving PdVSA; and (xiii) one of the highest officials of the Venezuelan government in connection with a high-profile money laundering and narcotics trafficking U.S. criminal investigation.
We have represented clients in cases and investigations all over Asia, including China, India, Japan, Korea, Hong Kong, Macau, Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore and Thailand in a wide variety of industries, including pharmaceutical, construction/ infrastructure, hospitality and mining. Our Asia practice includes successful representations involving: (i) numerous companies of varying size, both publicly traded and privately held, in connection with FCPA-related internal investigations and government enforcement actions involving the DOJ, SEC and multiple foreign enforcement agencies, (ii) numerous publicly-traded companies’ boards of directors, audit committees, and special committees of the board, with regard to the conduct of internal reviews of securities disclosure and accounting concerns and other compliance, enforcement or regulatory matters, and (iii) U.S. and Chinese companies in connection with private plaintiff and U.S. government antitrust litigation and investigations, including providing advice on dealing with Chinese government antitrust investigations and enforcement actions.
We have extensive experience providing counsel to clients in the Middle East, including as follows: (i) the Mina Group, the U.S. military’s largest supplier of jet fuel, in parallel U.S. Congressional and DOJ investigations into alleged corruption in their Middle East, Russia and Central Asia operations, ultimately obtaining a congressional report exonerating the Group; (ii) Dubai Islamic Bank (“DIB”) , the world’s largest Islamic bank, in consolidated proceedings in U.S. federal court involving claims arising from the September 11 terrorist attacks; (iii) Mubadala Development Co., one of the UAE’s largest sovereign wealth funds, in connection with civil forfeiture actions filed by the DOJ against a Malaysian businessman named Jho Low with whom our client has various joint ventures, relating to charges that Jho Low assisted various high-level Malaysian government officials to illegally divert funds from the Malaysian sovereign wealth fund 1MDB for their personal use; (iv) a Kuwaiti company, one of the largest logistics companies in the world, in defense of $500 million in claims and criminal charges brought by the U.S. government related to food supply contracts in Iraq, and (v) a Dubai-based company in connection with a DOJ criminal investigation into its relationships with sanctioned companies operating in the Middle East and Africa, ultimately obtaining a non-target letter from DOJ on behalf of our client.
Partners from our Sydney Office have successfully represented numerous prominent directors and officers facing regulatory investigation by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), as well as represented companies throughout Australia, New Zealand and southeast Asia in a variety of white collar investigations. Recently, we represented E*Trade after its Manila office was raided by the Philippine National Bureau of Investigation for alleged violations of Philippines securities laws. Within months, we obtained a dismissal of all alleged violations.
OUR WHITE COLLAR PARTNERS AROUND THE WORLD
Among our preeminent white collar partners are:
San Francisco and Silicon Valley
A. Bribery and Corruption
B. Money Laundering and Fraud
C. Economic Espionage and Trade Secrets
D. Tax Evasion and Economic Sanctions
F. Asset Forfeiture
I. Criminal Anti-Trust
J. Regulatory Investigations