The case involved £1.4bn in contested tax refund claims and raised critical questions about what it takes to prove fraud in a commercial dispute in the English Courts.Their analysis explores the judgment's implications for claimants pursuing fraud claims and what it reveals about the law's approach to dishonest conduct.
Read the full article (subscription required): https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/concealment-dishonesty-exploitation-but-no-fraud#:~:text=The%20judgment%20is%20a%20reminder,a%20defendant%20has%20been%20dishonest.