Ted is Co-Managing Partner in Quinn Emanuel’s London office and Co-Chair of the firm’s Energy Disputes practice. Since 1989, he has conducted commercial litigation as lead partner in all of the higher English courts on disputes ranging from general contract and tort claims, to company law, M&A, public law, fraud, intellectual property, tax, and antitrust matters. He has also undertaken cases before the European Court of Justice, the Tax Tribunal, the Copyright Tribunal, a Select Committee of the House of Commons and as counsel in numerous international arbitrations and expert determinations.
Although much of his work has been in the oil, gas, and power sectors (both UK and international), in which he has specialised since the 1980's, he has acted on numerous disputes relating to engineering and construction contracts and defects, shareholder and private equity disputes, media and product liability law, defence contracts, pharmaceutical licensing disputes, professional negligence (legal, accounting and valuation) and accountancy disputes arising on completion accounts.
Ted has conducted international arbitrations involving oil, gas, power, minerals, defence, pharmaceutical, investment partnerships, private equity, telecoms and other contracts in Africa, China, Europe, Central Asia, India, Indonesia, the Middle East, North America, South America, and the United Kingdom both as arbitrator and counsel.
He has been ranked as a leading practitioner by Chambers UK for over 25 years and is listed in Band 1 for Litigation and Energy and Natural Resources. Chambers UK said: “The “fantastic” Ted Greeno “is absolutely number one”“. He is also one of three litigation lawyers listed in the Chambers UK list of 100 leading business lawyers, which comments: “Ted exercises impeccable judgment, gets to the heart of the issue and explains it simply. Very easy to get along with and good at communicating with all levels of the organisation.”
Teams led by Ted have won four Litigation Team of the Year Awards. Unusually, if not uniquely, he is recognised by Who’s Who Legal as a Global Leader in three categories: Arbitration, Litigation and Energy.
- Phones 4u (by its administrators) in proceedings against Telefonica, Vodafone and EE relating to their conduct in terminating their support contract, which led to the insolvency of Phones 4u. (Chancery Division, 2019)
- Peter Bosworth and Colin Hurley in proceedings relating to an alleged $400 million oil trading fraud (Supreme Court in 2017 and the European Court of Justice in 2019).
- Providence Resources in a dispute under a drilling contract with Transocean arising from delivery of a rig with defective well control equipment (in the Court of Appeal, 2016)
- China Offshore Oil (Singapore) in a dispute with Vitol arising from the seizure of an oil tanker by port authorities in Nigeria (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales, 2012)
- Sky TV in its successful recovery of £318 million damages from Electronic Data Systems for fraudulent misrepresentation in obtaining the contract to integrate BSkyB’s customer relationship management (CRM) call centre systems (in the UK Technology and Construction Court from 2007 to 2010).
- Chevron in its successful defence of a claim by Total that their joint venture managing company was liable for the £1 billion costs of the Buncefield oil depot explosion and that, alternatively, Chevron was obliged to indemnify Total for its liability for those costs (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales in 2009, and the Court of Appeal in 2010).
- Guy Hands and seventy-four other investors in Bertrand v Baker Tilly and Anor 2008, in a successful recovery of damages for negligent advice regarding the tax implications of film finance schemes (in the Chancery Division of the UK High Court of Justice).
- Shell UK in proceedings before the Special Commissioners on how the Petroleum Revenue Tax applied to gas sold under the extended Brent Principal Agreement (in the Special Commissioners and Chancery Division in 2007).
- Dana and Star Petroleum International on its recovery of damages from Woodside Kenya for breach of an obligation to drill a carried well under a farm-in agreement (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales in 2010).
- ATP Oil & Gas Ltd on its successful defence of a claim by WesternGeco Ltd for a contractual indemnity under the standard contracts for the UK offshore oil and gas industry (formerly CRINE standard terms), against WesternGeco’s liability to compensate Total for damage to a wellhead marker buoy (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales in 2006).
- Chevron Nigeria Ltd in successful interpleader proceedings against International Finance Corp., in which an English court upheld for the first time a purchaser’s equitable lien under a contract for work and materials (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales in 2005).
- Intel Corporation against a defence by VIA Technologies, Inc to a patent enforcement action based on European competition law (in the Chancery Division of the Patents Court in 2003).
- TXU Europe Energy Trading Ltd in its successful defence of claims by Enron Capital and Trade Resources Ltd for alleged breach of two long-term ‘Virtual Power Station’ agreements, valued by Enron at £1.2 billion (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales in 2002).
- Amoco, BG, Amerada Hess, Phillips Petroleum, Agip and Fina as owners of the CATS North Sea gas pipeline in their successful claim under a send-or-pay gas transportation agreement with Enron, through which Enron sought to avoid paying for pipeline capacity and to ultimately escape its obligations under the J-Block take-or-pay gas agreements (in the Commercial Court of England and Wales, the Court of Appeal and, in 2001, the House of Lords).
- Koch Hightex Gmbh on its successful claim against New Millennium Experience Company for cancelling the contract to supply the roof for the Millennium Dome (in the Chancery Division in 1998 and 2001 and the Court of Appeal in 1999).
- BSkyB in proceedings against Performing Right Society Ltd, to determine the reasonable royalty payable for broadcast music (in the UK Copyright Tribunal in 1997).
- The Ninian and Heather Field Groups (comprising 10 oil companies) in relation to a dispute with the Alwyn North and South Field Groups concerning the latter’s entitlement to transport crude oil from the Alwyn South Field without paying a tariff (Chevron UK Ltd v Total Oil Marine plc and Elf Exploration PLC 1996 in the Chancery Division of the UK High Court of Justice).
- Obtaining an anti-suit injunction restraining parallel proceedings in Texas, USA (Amoco (UK) Exploration Co and Ors v Enron Corp 1996 in the Commercial Court in 1996).
- The owners of the Nelson gas field regarding proceedings arising from an expert’s equity redetermination under the Nelson Field Unitization Agreement (Svenska and Neste v Shell, Esso, Enterprise and Enterprise Elf 1992 in the Chancery Division of the UK High Court of Justice).
- Grand Metropolitan on its claim for the deferred purchase price of the William Hill betting business sold to Brent Walker; and defending Brent Walker’s claim for a £300 million price adjustment based on completion accounts to be determined by an expert accountant. The matter involved successful High Court proceedings for summary judgment of £50 million in 1990; and obtaining an Order for rectification of the relevant agreement following a four week trial; and proceedings before the expert accountant with regard to accounting issues (in the Chancery Division of the High Court and Court of Appeal of England and Wales in 1991, and the Chancery Division of the High Court of Justice in 1996).
- BSkyB on claims brought following the merger of BSB and Sky Television, defending numerous and substantial claims totalling £290 million, brought by consumer electronics companies in relation to the development and manufacture of systems unique to the old BSB technology. Judgments include Tatung UK v BSkyB 1993, Philips v BSkyB 1994 and Gillatt v Sky Television 2000 (all in the Court of Appeal of England and Wales).
- Most of Ted’s arbitrations are confidential. However, arbitrations that are in the public domain include:
- Enron Oil and Gas India Ltd v Oil and Natural Gas Corporation and another
- Elpis Finance v International Petroleum Refining Services
- Creighton Ltd v Government of the State of Qatar
- Svenska Petroleum v Government of Lithuania (as arbitrator)
- Shell Egypt West Manzala v Dana Gas Egypt Ltd.
- College of Law
- Kings College, University of London
(LLB, Honors, 1980)
- Solicitor, England and Wales
- Higher Rights of Audience (Civil), England and Wales
- Solicitor, Hong Kong
- Herbert Smith Freehills LLP:
- Partner, Litigation & Arbitration Department, 1989-2013
- Associate, 1983-1989
- Articled Clerk, 1981-1983
- Ted was named The Best Lawyers in the United Kingdom (2021 Edition) for Arbitration and Mediation
- Ted led the teams that won Litigation Team of the Year at The Lawyer Awards in 2009 and 2010; Litigation Team of the Year at the British Legal Awards in 2010; and Legal Business Litigation Team of the Year in 2011. Ted was also nominated for Partner of the Year at The Lawyer Awards in 2010.
- He is recognised as a leader in the fields of Dispute Resolution and Energy and Natural Resources in the major UK and international legal directories. He is also listed in Chambers UK's list of 100 leading business lawyers and is one of the 10 leading UK lawyers listed in Reuters' Superlawyers.
- Ted was recently selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers™ in UK 2018 in the fields of Arbitration & Mediation, Energy & Natural Resources (London), and Litigation (London).
- Accolades include:
- 'Ted exercises impeccable judgement, gets to the heart of the issue and explains it simply. Very easy to get along with and good at communicating with all levels of the organisation.' Chambers UK 100 (2013)
- 'The "fantastic" Ted Greeno, sources say, "is absolutely number one. He's very calm and very good at making judgement calls."' Chambers UK (2013)
- ‘Top of the league, Ted Greeno is “tactically astute and completely reliable”’. Chambers UK (2012)
- ‘Ted Greeno’s disputes practice is immensely respected within the energy industry – a sector he is reputed to “have made his own”.’ Chambers UK (2012)
- ‘Unfailingly impressive.’ Chambers UK (2011)
- ‘Ted Greeno is someone in whom you can place complete confidence. His tactical acumen is second to none and his calm, clear, analysis of the facts and law is extremely helpful in stressful situations.’ Legal 500 (2010)
- ‘Ted Greeno is “a hard tactical player and a redoubtable opponent”.’ Chambers UK (2009)
- ‘The disputes team is “hard to beat”, fielding the likes of the “legendary expert” Ted Greeno.' Chambers Global (2007), Energy and Natural Resources
- ‘Highly recommended litigation partners include Ted Greeno, “whose intellectual ability and tactical expertise one would find hard to fault”.' Legal 500 (2005)
- ‘Ted Greeno [is] known among peers as an aggressive fighter who is “happy to go to the nth degree”.’ Chambers (2003–2004)
- 'Ted Greeno has the respect, and sometimes the fear, of the competition.’ Chambers (2003–2004)
Ted has been a regular speaker and contributor to periodicals over the last 25 years on commercial litigation, arbitration and energy disputes. He also co-authored a chapter on Contract Pricing Disputes in Dispute Resolution in the Energy Sector, published by Globe Law and Business. Most recently, his article Drilling Rig Contracts: No More Paying For Nothing was published in E&P Magazine and his other work “So much for the rule of law – Ted Greeno on court fees and undermining the City” was featured in Legal Business.
- Ted sits on the London Commercial Court Users Committee. Over the years he has also sat on its sub-committees on Alternative Dispute Resolution, review of the Commercial Court Guide, Arbitration Appeals and on the Court's participation in the Jackson review on costs.
- Ted also sat on the "Unlocking Disputes" committee with representatives of the Judiciary, Bar and Ministry of Justice responsible for promoting London as a centre of international dispute resolution occasioned by the opening of the Rolls Building business courts.