Jared Newton is a first chair trial lawyer who specializes in high-stakes intellectual property disputes. He represents plaintiffs and defendants across a range of technologies, from artificial intelligence, semiconductors, and software to self-driving vehicles, jet engines, and medical devices. Jared joined Quinn Emanuel in 2011, as a founding member of the firm’s Washington, DC office and industry-leading Section 337 practice at the U.S. International Trade Commission. Today, he splits time between Washington and Wilmington, where he leads the firm’s Delaware intellectual property practice.
Jared has achieved significant trial success over the course of his career. Recently, he served as lead counsel for TVision and won a complete defense verdict in a patent trial involving audience-measurement technology. Jared examined five of the ten witnesses at trial, including a key cross examination of the opposing technical expert. He then delivered the closing argument, after which the jury deliberated for two hours before returning a verdict of non-infringement. On behalf of plaintiffs, Jared has won judgments and mid-trial settlements totaling hundreds of millions of dollars. He represented Waymo against Uber in a landmark trade secret trial related to self-driving vehicle technology. The case settled mid-trial, with Waymo receiving Uber equity then valued at $245 million. In the ADR space, Jared recently secured an arbitration victory for Hesai, in which the tribunal enforced a license agreement that shielded the company from infringement lawsuits and awarded it $6.4 million in fees and costs.
At the appellate level, Jared routinely appears at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, where he has argued as lead counsel in four appeals and served as principal brief author in several others. Leveraging his experience as a patent examiner, Jared also represents petitioners and patent owners in post-grant review proceedings at the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
Jared received his law degree from The George Washington University Law School, and his bachelor of science degree in mechanical engineering from Virginia Tech.
- Becton Dickinson
- C.R. Bard
- EIZO
- NVIDIA
- Qualcomm
- Samsung
- SawStop
- TSMC
- Varian Medical Systems
- VIZIO
- Waymo
- On behalf of C.R. Bard, obtained a complete jury verdict finding willful infringement of patents related to vascular access ports.
- On behalf of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., secured a jury verdict of non-infringement for two patents related to search and synchronization technology.
- On behalf of EIZO Corporation, obtained summary judgment of invalidity for patent related to calibrating display screens for medical applications. Argued the appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and won summary affirmance.
- On behalf of Canon, argued and won an inter partes review proceeding that invalidated all claims of a patent related to digital-camera technology. On appeal, Jared argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit and won summary affirmance.
- On behalf of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., argued a series of inter partes review hearings and obtained final written decisions invalidating competitor’s patents related to LTE technology that were asserted against Samsung in co-pending district court litigation.
- Represented Waymo in a trade secret trial against Uber related autonomous-vehicle technology. The case settled during trial and resulted in a settlement for Waymo valued as $245 million in Uber equity.
- Represented Neural Magic in a trade secret dispute against Meta related to machine-learning algorithms and software. Following the court’s rulings on summary judgment, the case settled before trial.
- Represented SawStop in a Section 337 investigation at the U.S. International Trade Commission, where he co-led the trial and obtained an exclusion order barring importation of a competitor’s table saws found to infringe two asserted patents.
- Represented Cree Inc. in a Section 337 Investigation related to light-emitting diodes and related products. Following trial, the ALJ found a violation in favor of Cree and ordered sanctions against the opposing side for discovery abuse.
- Represented Varian Medical Systems in a Section 337 Investigation related to radiotherapy systems. Following trial, the ALJ found a violation in favor of Varian and the case settled favorably prior to a final Commission determination.
- The George Washington University Law School
(J.D., with Honors, 2010) - Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
(B.S., Mechanical Engineering, 2005)
- The State Bar of Delaware
- The State Bar of Virginia
- The District of Columbia Bar
- Registered to Practice Before the United States Patent and Trademark Office
- U.S. Patent & Trademark Office:
- Patent Examiner, 2005-2009
- Patent Examiner, 2005-2009
- U.S. International Trade Commission:
- Law Clerk, 2010
- Ranked in Legal 500 USA: Intellectual Property: Patents: Litigation (ITC), “Recommended Lawyers,” 2024-2026
- Recognized by Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers: IP Litigation, Patent, Trade Secrets, 2025
- Presenter, “The Intersection of AI and Patents, Trade Secrets, and Open Source,” Practising Law Institute (January 23, 2025).
- Co-Author, "Good News For Trade Secret Actions At ITC." Law360. Portfolio Media. Inc. (January 5, 2018).
- Member, ITC Trial Lawyers Association
- Member, Federal Circuit Bar Association
- Member, AIPLA
- Member, ABA