In a recent article examining the evolving treatment of Schedule A intellectual property litigation, Quinn Emanuel associate Dylan Scher investigates how recent rulings may be signaling the increased scrutiny of a litigation model that has dominated online enforcement actions for more than a decade. Focusing on a pair of decisions from the Northern District of Illinois and the Seventh Circuit, the piece reflects on what may be a growing judicial unease with the procedural mechanics and outcomes of these cases, which often concern brand owners suing dozens, if not hundreds, of online sellers for sales of allegedly infringing products on major online platforms.
Read the full analysis here (subscription required).
Learn more about Dylan’s practice here.