Ten years ago, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) gave companies their first federal civil remedy for trade secret theft. Before it, businesses were left navigating a patchwork of inconsistent state laws: varying definitions, remedies, and procedures that created real uncertainty, especially for companies operating across multiple jurisdictions.
For Quinn Emanuel's Rachel Epstein, Co-Chair of the firm's Trademark, Copyright, and Trade Secret practices, the shift has been fundamental.
"It has created ... an overarching national framework, rather than relying on a patchwork of state laws."
The numbers back it up. Filings have more than doubled since 2016, with practitioners overwhelmingly favoring the federal route. For Epstein, the reason is straightforward: "Trade secret protection fills a gap," particularly for digital assets and data that don't always qualify for patent or copyright protection.
And she sees no sign of slowing: "The trend that I'm seeing is that both judges and practitioners have become much more comfortable with trade secret law."